Document Type : Research Article

Author

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Besiktas, Istanbul, 34349, Turkey

Abstract

In this experimental study, cutting temperatures and burr forms were investigated during MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication) milling of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel. In the experiments, uncoated and TiN (Titanium Nitride) coated WC (Tungsten Carbide) cutting tools were used and the experiments were performed under dry and MQL conditions. A commercial vegetable cutting fluid was chosen as cutting fluid and MQL flow rates were applied at 20 ml/h and 40 ml/h. Additionally, a nanofluid was prepared by adding nano graphene particles to the vegetable cutting fluid at 0,5%wt. Depending on the experimental results, low cutting temperature and small burr forms could have been obtained in the results of using TiN coated WC cutting tool and applying MQL method. In addition, the minimum cutting temperature and burr form were observed during MQL milling with nanofluid. Copyright © 2017 VBRI Press.

Keywords

1.Lin, T.R. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1998, 79, 41.
DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00451-2

2.
Lin, T.R. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2000, 108, 12.
DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00573-2

3.
Nordin, M.; Sundström, R.; Selinder T.I.; Hogmark, S. Surf. Coat.
Technol.
, 2000, 133-134, 240.
DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00933-6

4.
Lin, T.R. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, 127, 1.
DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00026-2

5.Shao, H.; Liu, L.; Qu, H.L. Wear, 2007, 263, 736.

DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.074

6.Liew, W.Y.H.; Ding, X. Wear, 2008, 265, 155.

DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2007.09.003

7.Biermann D.; Steiner, M. Procedia CIRP, 2012, 3, 97.

DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.018

8.de Lacelle, L.N.L.; Angulo, C.; Lamikiz, A.; Sánchez, J.A.;J.
Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 172, 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.08.014

9.Ekinović, S.; Begović, E.; Lušija, A. IBU Journal of Science and
Technology, 2014,2, 15.

10.
Rahman, M.; Kumar, A.S.; Salam, M.U. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu.,
2002
, 42, 539.
DOI:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00160-2

11.Kishawy, H.A.; Dumitrescu, M.; Ng, E.G.; Elbestawi, M.A.Int. J.
Mach. Tool. Manu., 2005, 45, 219.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.07.003

12.Liao, Y.S.; Lin, H.M.; Chen, Y.C.Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu., 2007,
47, 1667.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.005

13.Fratila, D.; Caizar, C.J. Cleaner Prod., 2011, 19, 640.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.007

14.Shahrom, M.S.; Yahya, N.M.;Yusoff, A.R. Procedia Eng.,2013,
53, 594.

DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.076

15.Hosakawa, A.; Ueda, T.; Onishi, R.; Tanaka, R.; Furumoto, T.
CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 59, 89.

DOI:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.053

16.Wang, S.; Clarens, A.F.Journal of Manufacturing Processes,
2013, 15, 41.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.015

17.Klocke, F.; Settineri, L.; Lung, D.; Priarone, P.C.; Arft,M.Wear,
2013, 302, 1136.

DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.035

18.Hadad, M;Sadeghi, B.J. Cleaner Prod., 2013, 54, 332.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.011

19.Lawal, A.A.; Choudhury, I.A.; Nukman, Y. J. Cleaner Prod.,
2013, 41, 210.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.016

20.Hwang, Y.;Park, H.S.;Lee, J.K.; Jung, W.H.Current Applied
Physics, 2006, 6S1, e67.

DOI:10.1016/j.cap.2006.01.014

21.Shen, B.; Malshe, A.P.; Kalita, P.; Shih,A.J.Transactions of
NAMRI/SME, 2008, 36, 357.

22.Lee, P.H.; Nam, T.S.; Li, C.; Lee,S.W.International Conference
on Manufacturing AutomationProceedings, 2010.

DOI:10.1109/ICMA.2010.54

23.Nam, J.S.; Lee, P.H.; Lee, S.W.Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu., 2011,
51, 649.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.005

24.Park, K.H.; Ewald, B.; Kwon, P.Y.J. Tribol., 2011, 133(3),
031803-1.

DOI:10.1115/1.4004339

25.Rahmati, B.; Sarhan, A.A.D.; Sayuti, M.J. Cleaner Prod., 2014,
66, 685.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.048

26.Sayuti, M.; Erh, O.M.; Sarhan, A.A.D.; Hamdi,M.J. Cleaner
Prod., 2014, 66, 655.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.058