Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere-402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Biomanufacturing integrates life science and engineering fundamentals to produce biocompatible products improving the pre-eminence of living. Face turning is an important process used for producing the higher accuracy on metal implants especially on sliding parts. In this experiment effect of depth of cut, feed rate and cutting speeds are considered on machined Co-Cr-Mo bio-implant alloy by application of RSM. The offline and online measured surface roughness (Ra) and cutting force (Fc) were considered respectively as response variables for investigations. The experimental result shows that depth of cut and feed rate are having predominating effect on measured surface roughness and cutting force respectively. Therefore, the developed models can be efficiently used to predict the surface roughness and cutting force on the machinability of
Co-Cr-Mo alloy within 95% confidence intervals ranges of measured parameters. For checking the adequacy of model a confirmation test has been conducted. The optimized parameters can be useful for industrial developments in surface generation for bio-implants. Copyright © 2018 VBRI Press.
 
 

Keywords

1.Boothroyd G;Knight W A;Fundamentals of Machining and
Machine Tools3rded. CRC press;2006;Taylor & Francis Group.

2.Montgomery D C;Design and Analysis of Experiments 4thed.;
1997;John Wiley & sons Inc.

3.Fischer A;Subsurface micro structural alterations during sliding
wear of biomedical metals. Modeling and experimental results,
ComputationalMaterialsScience;2009;46(3);586590.

4.Ohmori H;Katahira K;Akinou Y;Komotori J;Mizutani M;
Investigation on grinding characteristics and surface modifying
effects of biocompatible Co-Cr alloy; Annals of CIRP; 2006;55;
156-161.

5.Grgazka;Dahlke M;Dabrowski J R;Dabrowski B;Modification
of mechanical properties of sintered implant materials on the base
of Co-Cr-Mo alloy;Journal of Material Processing Technology;
2008;199205.

6.Yang S;Dillion O W;Puleo D A;Jawahir I S; Effect of burnishing
on surface integrity modifications of Co-Cr-Mo biomedical alloy;

Journal of Biomedical Material Research B Application of
Biomater
ials; 2013; 101 (1);139-152.
7.Uddin M S;On the influence and optimization of cutting
parameters in finishing of metallic femoral heads of hip implants;
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology;
2014; 73;1523-1532.

8.Satyanarayana K; Venu GopalA;Optimal machining conditions
for turning Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology,

Advances in Manufacturing
; 2013; 1 (4);329339.
9.Makadia A J;Nanavati J I;Optimization of machining parameters
for turning operations based on response surface methodology;
Measurement; 2013; 46;1521-1529.

10.Lalwani D I;Mehta N K;Jain P K;Experimental investigations of
cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface
roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel;Journal of
Material Processing Technology;2008; 206;167179.

11.Saini S;Ahuja I S;Sharma V S;Influence of cutting parameters on
tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 tool
steel usingceramic tools;International Journal of Precision
Engineering and Manufacturing; 2012; 13 (8);12951302.
 
 


Research Article2018, 3(4), 289-297Advanced MaterialsProceedings


Copyright © 2018 VBRI Press297


12.Mandal N;Doloi B;Mondal B;Force prediction model of zirconia
toughened alumina (ZTA) inserts in hard turning of AISI 4340
steel using response surface methodology;International Journal of
Precision Engineering and Manufacturing; 2012; 13 (9);1589
1599.

13.Pawade R S;Joshi S S;Multi-objective optimization of surface
roughness and cutting forces in high-speed turning of Inconel 718
using Taguchi grey relational analysis (TGRA);International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2011; 56 (1);
47-62.

14.Liu M;Ming W W;Zhang Y S;Xu H;Chen M;Machinability
Evaluation of TC11 Titanium Alloy in Finish Hard Turning Based
on the Response Surface Methodology;Advanced Materials
Research; 2009; 69, 495-499.

15.Bruschi S;Ghiotti A;Bordin A;Effect of the Process Parameters
on the Machinability Characteristics of a CoCrMo Alloy, Key
Engineering Materials; 2013;554-557;1976-1983.

16.JagtapK A;Pawade R S;Giradkar K V;Investigations on
Machined Surface Integrity and Electrochemical behaviour of
Co-Cr-Mo Bio-implant Alloy;International Journal of Advanced
Design and Manufacturing Technology; 2016; 9 (4);51-58.

17.Bordin A;Bruschi S;Ghiotti A;The effectof cutting speed and
feed rate on the surface integrity in dry turning of CoCrMo alloy;
2ndCIRP Conference on Surface Integrity; Procedia CIRP; 2014;
13;219-224.

18.BernhardK;Joachim D;Influence of the tool geometry on the
machining of cobalt chromium femoral heads;The Second CIRP
Conference on Biomanufacturing, Procedia CIRP;2016; 49;
67 71.

19.Ilhan A;Süleyman N;Mehmet A I;Optimization of parameters
affecting surface roughness of Co28Cr6Mo medical material
during CNC lathe machining by using the Taguchi and RSM
methods;Measurement; 2016; 78;120128.

20.Pawade R S;Joshi S S;Brahmankar P K;Effect of machining
parameters and cutting edge geometry on surface integrity of high-
speed turned Inconel 718;International Journal of Machine Tools
& Manufacture; 2008; 48;1528.

21.JagtapKetan A; Pawade Raju S;Experimental investigation on
surface roughness of face turned Co-Cr-Mo biocompatible alloy
followed by polishing, Journal of Material Science and Surface
Engineering; 2017; 5 (4);585-592

22.Design-Expert Software User’s Guide Technical Manual; Version
10;Stat-Ease Inc.; 2016; Minneapolis MN.